Writ petition dismissed after petitioner failed to respond to repeated calls; court concluded the petitioner had lost interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 1191 of 2022
----
Suraj Kumar Bedia .... Petitioner
-- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand and Others .... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
| For the Petitioner | :- | --- none |
|---|---|---|
| For the State | :- | A.C. to G.A. -III |
| For the Resp.-JSIC | :- | Mr. Sanjoy Piprawal, Advocate |
| Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate |
petitioner, however, learned State counsel as well as the learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the respondent -JSIC are present.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
SI/,
Suraj Kumar Bedia
The State of Jharkhand
Jharkhand State Industrial Corporation (JSIC)
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
