Dismissed
Mohammad Israil v. Nageshwar Ganjhu Nagendra
Jharkhand HCSA/605/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for default as the appellant did not appear despite repeated calls.
What the court decided
AI extract
Second appeal dismissed for default as the appellant did not appear despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.A. No. 605 of 2004
Mohammad Israil .... .... …. Appellant
Versus
Nageshwar Ganjhu @ Nageshwar Pahan & Ors.
.... .... .... Respondents
------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------ For the Appellant : None For the Respondents : None
Order No.08 Dated- 10.07.2024
No one turns up on behalf of the appellant in-spite of repeated
calls.
This appeal is dismissed for default of the appellant.
Sonu-Gunjan/-
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Mohammad Israil
Nageshwar Ganjhu @ Nageshwar Pahan
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court