Dismissed¶14

Ranjan Kumar Pathak v. Sandhya Kumari

Jharkhand HC22 Oct 2024C.Rev./20/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand High Court, Civil Review No. 20 of 2020 — review of rejection of first appeal (First Appeal No. 204 of 2008) against dismissal of suit for dissolution of marriage/divorce; ground: absence of error apparent on the face of the record; result: review application dismissed; Judges Rongon Mukhopadhyay and Pradeep Kumar Srivastava; appellant Ranjan Kumar Pathak, respondent Sandhya Kumari; counsel Jai Shankar Tripathi for appellant; decided 22.10.2024.

What did the court decide?

None; the review application is dismissed. ¶14

Ranjan Kumar Pathak Vs Sandhya Kumari — Jharkhand HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No. 20 of 2020

¶2

¶3

Ranjan Kumar Pathak S/o Jai Deo Pathak, R/o Road no. 6, Indrapuri, … Ratu Road, PO Indrapuri, PS Sukhdeo Nagar, Ranchi Appellant Versus

¶4

Sandhya Kumari w/o Ranjan Kumar Pathak, R/o Road No. 6, Indrapuri, Ratu Road, PO Indrapuri, PS Sukhdeo Nagar, Ranchi

¶5

… … Respondent

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

¶7

¶8

For the Appellant : Mr. Jai Shankar Tripathi, Advocate : For the Respondent

¶9

¶10

4/22.10.2024 Defects as pointed out by the office are ignored.

¶11

Heard Mr. Jai Shankar Tripathi, learned counsel for the appellant.

¶12

This application has been preferred by the appellant for review of the order dated 27.03.2018 passed by a coordinate Bench of this court in First Appeal No. 204 of 2008 whereby and whereunder the appeal preferred by the appellant against the order by which his suit for dissolution of marriage has been dismissed has been rejected.

¶13

There does not appear to be any ground enumerated in this application or submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant which would indicate any error apparent in the face of record in the order dated 27.03.2018 passed in First Appeal No. 204 of 2008.

¶14

On consideration of the aforesaid, we therefore dismiss this review application.

¶15

(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)

¶16

(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)

¶17

R Shekhar Cp 2

Ranjan Kumar Pathak v. Sandhya Kumari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjan Kumar Pathak v. Sandhya Kumari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bimla Pandit Alias Kumari Vs Bhavesh Prasad Pandit

Masai Pasi Vs State of Bihar

Bhawesh Prasad Pandit Vs Bimla Pandit Alias Kumari

Ranjan Kumar Singh Vs Swati Singh

Tej Narayan Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ram Dinesh Singh Vs Arpan Singh