Petitioner, having been acquitted by the trial court, sought to withdraw his criminal revision. Counsel stated the revision would not be pressed; the High Court dismissed it as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 956 of 2022
------
Mrigendra Pratap Singh @ Shambhu Singh.... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opp. Party
------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P.
------
Order No. 05 Dated- 12.04.2024
Mr. Soumitra Baroi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that as the petitioner has been acquitted by the learned trial court. As such, he does not want to press this criminal revision.
Accordingly, the instant criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed subject to removal of the defects as pointed out by the office.
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
Umesh-Suman/uploaded
Mrigendra Pratap Singh @ Shambhu Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Arun Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
