Petitioner in a criminal revision died during pendency; the APP filed an affidavit with death circumstances, and the revision petition was disposed of as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 631 of 2018
Kanchan Munda, son of Late Jhanak Munda, Resident of Piskahatu, P.O. and P.S. Arki, District Khunti (Jharkhand) …… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ……Opposite party
----------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P.
Order No.05/ Dated:20.06.2024
Sole petitioner reported to be died and in this regard learned APP has filed affidavit alongwith death circumstances.
In that circumstances, this Criminal Revision petition is disposed of as abated.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
R.K/
Kanchan Munda
The State of Jharkhand
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
