High Court allows bail appeal, setting aside order rejecting bail for human trafficking charge, and grants bail for appellant.
Appellant to be released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 544 of 2024
-----
Rajesh Oraon. ..... Appellant Versus
State of Jharkhand. ..... .Respondent
Coram: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
-------- For the Appellant : Ms. Apurva Shrestha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, A.P.P. --------
I.A. No. 4780 of 2024
02/15.5.2024 Heard the parties.
This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning a delay of 38 days in preferring the appeal.
Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 38 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.
I.A. No. 4780 of 2024 stands disposed of.
Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 544 of 2024
This appeal is directed against the order dated 1.2.2024, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Latehar in Misc. Cr. Application No. 77 of 2024 arising out of A.H.T.U P.S. Case No. 04/2023 by which the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
-2-
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay,J)
(Deepak Roshan, J)
Rakesh/-
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the order rejecting bail should be set aside and appellant released on bail.
Interim application to condone delay in filing appeal.
Whether the appellant is eligible for bail conditions.
Rajesh Oraon
State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
