Shaheed Akhtar v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed for non-prosecution after petitioners failed to appear despite repeated calls; the State's counsel argued lack of diligence.
Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed for non-prosecution after petitioners failed to appear despite repeated calls; the State's counsel argued lack of diligence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 3888 of 2018
------
… Opposite PartiesCORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, Addl.P.P. ------
Order No:- 06 Dated 20.09.2024
Heard the learned Adl. P.P. appearing for the State.
No one turns up for the petitioners in spite of repeated calls.
Learned Adl.P.P. for the State submits that since there is no merit in this
MM/
Shahid Akhtar
Julekha Khatoon
Ejaul Ansari
State of Jharkhand
Asiya Parween
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court