present in court on each date, to which the case would be fixed by the court. It is then submitted that; non-appearance of the petitioners who are the accused persons of the said case and who were on bail and undertaking in their bail bonds to remain present on each of the dates, to which the case is fixed but avoiding examination of the witness who was present in the court and harassing the witness by not remaining present nor filing any petition for dispensing with their personal attendance through their lawyer, is itself a sufficient ground for cancellation of their bail and the same has been mentioned by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh. It is next submitted by the learned Spl. P.P. that an accused on bail cannot take the liberty, not to remain present in court on the date fixed, without the permission of the court and if the accused for any reason is unable to remain present in the court, on the date fixed by his own arrangement, he has the choice of remaining in judicial custody. Then it will be upon the court to ensure his presence before it as and when desired by the court. It is next submitted that here, in this case, the petitioners want to have cake and eat it too. They want to remain on bail but want the liberty not to appear before the court as per their sweet will, on the date fixed by the court and to prolong the trial by harassing the witnesses by not taking any steps either for dispensing with their personal attendance or remaining present to ensure that the witness present is not turned back by the Court. It is next submitted that there is also no
