Quashing petition challenging revisional court's order setting aside an Executive Magistrate's section 145 Cr.P.C. order that had declared sale deeds void. The High Court held that validity of sale deeds cannot be decided in a section 145 proceeding and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr.M.P. No. 2033 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
----
Tokan Mahto .... Petitioner
-- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand and Another .... Opposite Parties ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
--For the Petitioner :- Mrs. Vani Kumari, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Achinto Sen, Advocate ----
4 /12.01.2024 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and
the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent State.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
SI/,
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Executive Magistrate could declare sale deeds illegal and void in a section 145 Cr.P.C. proceeding.
Whether the revisional court rightly set aside the Magistrate's section 145 order.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Tokan Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
O.P. No. 2
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
