Contempt petition where petitioner's counsel stated the court's earlier order had been complied with; court found no contempt and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 33 of 2022
Virendra Pratap Singh aged about 71 years, Son of Late Jaleshwar Singh, Resident of Village Gudri Singh Ka Tola, P.O + P.S. Pandeypur, Dist. - Ballia (U.P), at present residing at Plot No. 44, Cooperative Colony, Bokaro Steel City, PO + PS + District Bokaro ... Petitioner
Versus
… … ... Opp. Parties
--------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate For the O.Ps : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate ---------
09/Dated: 03.10.2024
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Court’s order has been complied in its true letter and spirit.
In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the same is dropped.
Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of.
( M. S. Ramachandra Rao , C.J.)
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
APK/RK
Virendra Pratap Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Amarendu Prakash
Sameer Swarooop
Bhupernder Singh Popli
M. S. Ramachandra Rao
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
