Disposed¶21

Arjun Mahto v. State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC16 Jan 2024Cont.(Cvl)/172/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Arjun Mahto v. State of Jharkhand & Ors., Cont. Case (Civil) No. 172 of 2022, High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi, decided 16.01.2024 by Rajesh Shankar, J. Contempt proceeding for alleged willful non-compliance with order dated 22.12.2021 in W.P.(C) No. 4824 of 2021 dropped upon counsel's statement of compliance; contempt petition disposed of. Keywords: contempt petition, compliance, dropping of contempt proceeding, W.P.(C) No. 4824 of 2021, Deputy Commissioner Giridih.

What did the court decide?

Contempt proceeding against the opposite parties dropped; contempt petition disposed of without further proceedings. ¶21

Arjun Mahto Vs State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

Cont. Case (Civil) No. 172 of 2022

---

Arjun Mahto

… … Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

¶9

Sri Rahul Sinha, Deputy Commissioner, Giridih

¶10

Sri Naman Priyesh Lakra, present Deputy Commissioner, Giridih

¶11

…. … Opp. Parties

¶12

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Sidhartha Roy, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mrs. Mohini Gupta, A.C. to S.C.(Mines)-I

¶13

Order No. 06 Dated: 16.01.2024

¶14

The present contempt petition has been filed for initiation

¶15

of contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties alleging willful violation of order dated 22.12.2021 passed in W.P.(C) No. 4824 of 2021.

¶16

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 22.12.2021 passed in the aforesaid writ petition has been complied.

¶17

3. Considering the said submission, there is no need to

¶18

further proceed in the present matter.