Husband sought confirmation of provisional anticipatory bail in a complaint case under sections 323, 504 and 498A IPC. Parties were residing together happily. The court confirmed the provisional bail, directing surrender within two weeks with bail bonds and sureties under Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 888 of 2023
Rajesh Choudhary
...... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .…. … Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Diwakar Jha, Advocate For the State :Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Ms. Bandana Sinha, Advocate
09/ 06.05.2024 : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No.2.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
satyarthi-
1
1 issue framed by the court
Should the provisional anticipatory bail granted on 16.01.2024 be confirmed where the petitioner failed to surrender due to miscommunication and the parties have reconciled?
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajesh Choudhary
The State of Jharkhand
O.P. No.2
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court