Anticipatory bail application in a dowry and cruelty-related complaint case. The court declined to decide merits, directing the petitioner to appear before the trial court within three weeks for regular bail, to be considered per Supreme Court guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.870 of 2024
Md. Imran, S/o Late Md. Haider, R/o Village-Jhapo Darzi Mohalla-Ward No.7, P.O.-Jhumritillaya, P.S.-Tillaya, DistrictKoderma. .......... Petitioner.
-Versus-
.......... Opp. Parties.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
----For the Petitioner : Ms. Nazia Rashid, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate -----
Order No.10 Date: 21.11.2024
Investigation & Anr.” reported in 2022 (10) SCC 51 as well as the observation made in the case of “Satender
Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation &
Anr.” reported in 2024 (9) SCC 198.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Vikas/
-2-
A.B.A. No.870 of 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a complaint case under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act offences.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.Relied on
2022 (10) SCC 51 · Who else cites this
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.Relied on
2024 (9) SCC 198 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Md. Imran
The State of Jharkhand
Chandani Khatoon @ Aleesha Khatoon
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
