Petitioner, an accused in a Sessions Trial under the Arms Act, sought bail citing lack of incriminating articles from his possession and other co-accused being on bail. Court granted bail subject to bond and sureties.
Petitioner to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7477 of 2024
Binod Kumar @ Kanhaiya ... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P. --------
Order No. 04 / Dated 02nd September, 2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.
D.S.
who was also apprehended alongwith this petitioner number of arms and ammunitions have been recovered although he did not controvert this fact that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner except one mobile phone.
(Navneet Kumar, J.)
2 B.A. No.7477 of 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be enlarged on bail in a case related to the Arms Act?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Binod Kumar @ Kanhaiya
The State of Jharkhand
Navneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
