Regular bail application by an accused in a gangrape case under section 376(D) IPC and section 6 POCSO Act. The victim's statement under section 164 CrPC contained direct allegations of gangrape against the petitioner; medical opinion put her age at 18 but her statement said 14. Bail was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A No. 7334 of 2023
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, A.P.P.
08 / 09.02.2024 Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, learned A.P.P files counter affidavit in the court today. Let it be kept on the record.
(Ambuj Nath, J)
Ranjeet/
Uploaded
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner accused of gangrape under sections 376(D) IPC and section 6 POCSO Act should be enlarged on bail.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Petitioner (accused in Chitra P.S. Case No. 13 of 2023)
O.P-State
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
