Ravi Swarnkar v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application withdrawn by the petitioner at the hearing; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Bail application withdrawn by the petitioner at the hearing; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 607 of 2024
Ravi Swarnkar … … Petitioner
The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
For the Petitioner: M/s. Aman Shekhar, Advocate For the State : M/s. P. K. Mishra, A.P.P
05/02.05.2024 Learned lawyer appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Bail Application.
Prayer is allowed.
This Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ambuj Nath, J.)
Saurabh
uploaded
Ravi Swarnkar
The State of Jharkhand
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court