A.B.A. No.6065 of 2024, Shantanu v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr., High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi, Rajesh Shankar, J., order dated 18.09.2024 — anticipatory bail application dismissed as withdrawn after process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. issued against petitioner during pendency.
Prayer for withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application allowed; application dismissed as withdrawn. ¶13
Considering the prayer for withdrawal made in view of the issuance of process under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C., the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ¶13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.6065 of 2024
Shantanu, S/o Mahendra Singh, R/o-412 A.B. Nagar Unnao, P.O.-Unnao, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Unnao (Uttar Pradesh)
.......... Petitioner.
-Versus-
.......... Opp. Parties.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
----For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahavir Pd. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P. ----- Order No.02 Date: 18.09.2024
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Arpit/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application in view of the issuance of process under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. against him during its pendency.¶12
Considering the prayer for withdrawal made in view of the issuance of process under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C., the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.ratio¶13
1 provisions across 1 enactments
How this case reached the court
During the pendency of the present anticipatory bail application, process under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. was issued against the petitioner.¶12
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
