In a special bail application, the single judge rejected the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail in a murder case, deeming him broadly involved in the assault causing death despite not being named in the FIR.
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 600 of 2024
Manish Kumar Gond … Petitioner
-Versus-
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kumar Dey, A.P.P.
04/09.04.2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Ajay/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be extended to the petitioner who is apprehending arrest in a case involving assault causing death.
Whether the petitioner's involvement in the assault justifies the rejection of anticipatory bail despite not being named in the FIR.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manish Kumar Gond
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
