Petitioners in a civil miscellaneous petition sought withdrawal after some arguments; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 583 of 2016
Versus
……… Opp. Parties
CORAM : HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N. PATHAK HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR
For the Petitioners: Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate
For the O.P. : xxxx
04/ 25.07.2024 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks
permission of this Court for withdrawal of the instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, C.M.P. No. 583 of 2016 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. S. N. Pathak, J.)
(Navneet Kumar, J.)
Kunal
1
Amrendra Kumar Singh
Nasik Darshan Das @ Nasik Das
National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Mostt. Jiyawala
Yudhisthir Goswamy
Basishtha Narayan Goswamy
S.N. Pathak
Navneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
