Sandeep Kumar Paswan v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application withdrawn by the petitioner; permission granted and the application dismissed as withdrawn.
Anticipatory bail application withdrawn by the petitioner; permission granted and the application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction)
BA No. 47 of 2024
Sandeep Kumar Paswan ... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
For the Petitioner : Mr. N.K.Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P.
-------- Order No.02/Dated: 14th March, 2024
When the matter was called out, the learned counsels for the
parties have appeared.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ratnaker Bhengra, J.)
KNR
Sandeep Kumar Paswan
The State of Jharkhand
Ratnaker Bhengra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court