Anticipatory bail application withdrawn by the petitioner after arguments, with no objection from the State; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.423 of 2024
------
Rakesh Kumar Tiwary @ Rakesh Tiwary
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand .... .... ....Opposite Party
------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Vinay Kr. Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Nitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Adv.
------
Order No.07 Dated- 07.05.2024
After considerable arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave from this Court to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
Pappu/
Rakesh Kumar Tiwary @ Rakesh Tiwary
The State of Jharkhand
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
