Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a civil revision; the opposite party raised no objection, and the revision was dismissed as withdrawn with pending interlocutory applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Civil Revision No. 28 of 2019
Anjani Kumar Kashi … Petitioner
Vs.
Nishant Kumar Sinha … Opp. Party
---------- CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratyush Kumar, Advocate For the O.P. : Mr. Bhaiya V. Kumar, Advocate -----------
10/ 01.03.2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant Civil Revision.
Learned counsel for the opposite party does not object for the same.
In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
All pending I.As. stands closed.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
Rohit/-
Anjani Kumar Kashi
Nishant Kumar Sinha
S.N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
