Petitioners, father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry death case. Police final form did not send them up for trial but cognizance was taken. The court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
A.B.A. No. 129 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 129 of 2023
-Versus-
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners : Mr. S.P. Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party-State : Mrs. Shweta Singh, A.P.P. For O.P. No.2 : Mrs. Supriya Dayal, Advocate -----
04/25.01.2024 Heard Mr. S.P. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs. Shweta Singh, learned counsel for the State and Mrs. Supriya Dayal, learned counsel for opposite party no.2.
however, the learned Court has been pleased to take cognizance.
2
A.B.A. No. 129 of 2023
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Ajay/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners (in-laws of the deceased) in a dowry death case where the police did not send them up for trial but cognizance was taken.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Rajgir Pandit @ Rajgir Pundit
Genda Devi
The State of Jharkhand
Jhabu Pandit
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
