Petitioner sought permission to withdraw an anticipatory bail application; the court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn. No merits were decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1089 of 2024
Mandip Kumar @ Amardip Kumar … Petitioner
- Versus -
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
----For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Amit Kr. Tiwari, Advocate ---
03/11.06.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw
this Anticipatory Bail Application.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Ambuj Nath, J.)
Jay/-
Mandip Kumar @ Amardip Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Sangita Kumari
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
