there is no doubt that the petitioner has not worked for certain period on the basis of No work No Pay the order can be passed, but there are parameters of passing such order. If the Court comes to the conclusion that there is illegality on behalf of the authority concerned, the petitioner was not allowed to work, the court is required to quash the order and to pass appropriate order. In the case in hand, it has already been held by this Court that the impugned order is not in accordance with law and further earlier dismissal order has already been quashed. Thus, for the wrong of the respondent-State the petitioner was prevented to work and if such a situation is there the case of the petitioner is covered in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Pradeep son of Raj Kumar Jain v. Manganese Ore (India) Ltd. reported in (2022) 3 SCC 683 in which it has been held that the question arises as to whether the back wages is to be given and as to what is to be the extent of that back wages, these are the aspects which will depend on the facts of the case as noted in Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.Ed.) & Ors., (2013) 10 SCC 324 .
