Dismissed

Sanjeev Kumar Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC23 Mar 2023WPC/621/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed multiple writ petitions challenging the allotment of acquired land to industrialists. Relying on a coordinate bench's precedent that acquired land must be utilized for intended purposes, the Court held that the petitions failed; the land acquired for industrial development could not be returned to the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

All writ petitions and pending interlocutory applications were dismissed.

Sanjeev Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand — Land Acquisition | Jharkhand HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No.616 of 2020 With W.P. (C) No.615 of 2020 With W.P. (C) No.617 of 2020 With W.P. (C) No.618 of 2020 With W.P. (C) No.621 of 2020 With W.P. (C) No.622 of 2020 With W.P. (C) No.630 of 2020

¶3

¶4

Lachhman Mandal .......... Petitioner. [In W.P.(C) No.616/2020] Subhash Prasad Yadav .......... Petitioner. [In W.P.(C) No.615/2020] Md. Izhar Alam .......... Petitioner. [In W.P.(C) No.617/2020] Mahaveer Mandal .......... Petitioner. [In W.P.(C) No.618/2020] Sanjeev Kumar Yadav .......... Petitioner. [In W.P.(C) No.621/2020] Kamdev Mandal .......... Petitioner. [In W.P.(C) No.622/2020] Baldev Kol .......... Petitioner. [In W.P.(C) No.630/2020] -Versus-

¶5

State of Jharkhand

¶6

The Secretary, Department of Land & Revenue, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi.

¶7

The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar.

¶8

The Sub Divisional Officer, Deoghar.

¶9

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Deoghar.

¶10

The Circle Officer, Devipur, District Deoghar.

¶11

The Block Development Officer, Devipur, District Deoghar.

¶12

Officer-in-charge, Devipur, District Deoghar.

¶13

.......... Respondents. [In all cases]

¶14

----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----For the Petitioners : Md. M. Khan, Advocate [In all cases] For State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Roy, A.C. to G.A.III [In all cases] ----- Order No.10 Date: 23.03.2023

¶15

W.P.(C) No.616 of 2020 has been filed for issuance of direction upon

¶16

the respondent no.3 to stop allotment/handing over the possession of irrigated multi-cropped land of Jamabandi holders/ raiyats including that of the petitioner and his co-sharers, appertaining to J.B. no.11,

¶17

¶18

plot no.443, measuring an area of 3.93 acres, Mouja Kokhara, Thana no.176, P.S. & Circle Devipur, District Deoghar, for the purpose of opening Small Scale Industries by the industrialists.

¶19

W.P.(C) No.615 of 2020 has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent no.3 to stop allotment/handing over the possession of irrigated multi-cropped land of Jamabandi holders/ raiyats including that of the petitioner and his co-sharers, appertaining to J.B. no.27, plot nos.424, 427, 438, 439, 441 & 429, measuring an area of 9.65 acres, Mouja Kokhara, Thana no.176, P.S. & Circle Devipur, District Deoghar, for the purpose of opening Small Scale Industries by the industrialists.

¶20

W.P.(C) No.617 of 2020 has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent no.3 to stop allotment/handing over the possession of irrigated multi-cropped land of Jamabandi holders/ raiyats including that of the petitioner and his co-sharers, appertaining to J.B. no.23, plot no.434, measuring an area of 1.53 acres, Mouja Kokhara, Thana no.176, P.S. & Circle Devipur, District Deoghar, for the purpose of opening Small Scale Industries by the industrialists.

¶21

W.P.(C) No.618 of 2020 has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent no.3 to stop allotment/handing over the possession of irrigated multi-cropped land of Jamabandi holders/ raiyats including that of the petitioner and his co-sharers, appertaining to J.B. no.03, plot no.447, measuring an area of 6.82 acres, Mouja Kokhara, Thana no.176, P.S. & Circle Devipur, District Deoghar, for the purpose of opening Small Scale Industries by the industrialists.

¶22

W.P.(C) No.621 of 2020 has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent no.3 to stop allotment/handing over the possession of irrigated multi-cropped land of Jamabandi holders/ raiyats including that of the petitioner and his co-sharers, appertaining to J.B. no.13,

¶23

¶24

plot nos.430, 431, 432 & 433, measuring an area of 1.83 acres, Mouja Kokhara, Thana no.176, P.S. & Circle Devipur, District Deoghar, for the purpose of opening Small Scale Industries by the industrialists.

¶25

W.P.(C) No.622 of 2020 has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent no.3 to stop allotment/handing over the possession of irrigated multi-cropped land of Jamabandi holders/ raiyats including that of the petitioner and his co-sharers, appertaining to J.B. no.21, plot no.448, measuring an area of 11.80 acres, Mouja Kokhara, Thana no.176, P.S. & Circle Devipur, District Deoghar, for the purpose of opening Small Scale Industries by the industrialists.

¶26

W.P.(C) No.630 of 2020 has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent no.3 to stop allotment/handing over the possession of irrigated multi-cropped land of Jamabandi holders/ raiyats including that of the petitioner and his co-sharers, appertaining to J.B. no.10, plot nos.428, 437 & 442, measuring an area of 7.95 acres, Mouja Kokhara, Thana no.176, P.S. & Circle Devipur, District Deoghar, for the purpose of opening Small Scale Industries by the industrialists.

¶27

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Roy, learned A.C. to G.A.III, appearing on behalf of the respondents in all the writ petitions submits that a similar writ petition being W.P.(C) No.1145 of 2020 (Sahdev Prasad Yadav & Ors. Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.) has been dismissed by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 9^th November, 2022.

¶28

I have perused the order dated 9^th November, 2022 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.1145 of 2020, relevant part of which reads as under:-

¶29

“ “Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 Mr. Pradeep Kumar, AC to AAG-IV has submitted, that once a land has been acquired by the State, it is upon the State to utilize it for any other purposes.

¶30

Learned counsel for the respondent no.4, Mr. R.C. P. Sah has submitted, that the land has been acquired for the purpose of industrial area and the same is being granted to the entrepreneur for development of industries, as such the land which has been acquired

¶31

¶32

by Land Acquisition Case No. 07/2009-10 cannot be returned to the petitioners at any cost.

¶33

Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as the land has been rightly acquired by the State and is being used, in view of the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment, for development of industrial growth in the State of Jharkhand.

¶34

Accordingly, the writ petition is hereby dismissed.”

¶35

Since the present batch of writ petitions involve similar issue as raised in W.P.(C) No.1145 of 2020, which has already been dismissed by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 9^th November, 2022,

¶36

the same are also dismissed in terms with the said order.

¶37

Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, in respective writ petition(s) is/are also dismissed.

¶38

(Rajesh Shankar, J.)

¶39

Sanjay/

Sanjeev Kumar Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Kumar Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kshitij Chandra Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Chiranjilal Tibrewal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ram Nath Mahto Vs M S Bharat Cocking Coal Ltd. through Its Managing Director

Subhash Prasad Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mahaveer Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Izhar Alam Vs the State of Jharkhand