Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon joint submission by parties that petitioners' grievances were already redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 5128 of 2013
… Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Jharkhand
2. The Principal Secretary, Water Resource Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi
3. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi
4. The Joint Secretary, Water Resource Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi .. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. N. PATHAK
For Petitioner : Mr. Amit Sinha, Advocate For Respondents :Mr. Rishi Raj Verma, AC to SC-II ---
10/01.02.2023 Learned counsel for the parties jointly submits that writ petition has become infructuous since the grievances of the petitioners have already been redressed.
In view of fair submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
/punit/
Lakshmi Narayan
Manimay Arun
State of Jharkhand
The Principal Secretary, Water Resource Department, Govt. of Jharkhand
S. N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
