The High Court of Jharkhand, agreeing that the writ petition had become infructuous, granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the same. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The decision is procedural and disposes of the matter without substantive legal propositions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 308 of 2021
(Pankaj Kumar Lal Vs. Union of India and Ors.)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN .
For the petitioner(s): Mr. Shrestha Gautam, Advocate. For UOI: Mr.Anil Kumar, Addl.SGI. Mr. Shiv Kr. Sharma, CGC
06/18.01.2023: Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition,
as the same has become infructuous.
Permission, as sought for, is accorded.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Anu/-CP2.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
Pankaj Kumar Lal
Union of India
ANANDA SEN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
