The High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi dismissed a writ petition as infructuous upon the counsel for the petitioner submitting that it had become so and the respondents not objecting.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 1455 of 2014
Shri Krishna Sundi
… Petitioner
Versus
1. Union of India
2. Deputy Assistant Director, Army Group Insurance, Adjutant General’s Branch, Army Head Quarter, West Block-II, RK. Puram, New Delhi
.. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. N. PATHAK
----For Petitioner : Mr. R.P. Gupta, Advocate For Respondents : Mr Prabhat Kr. Sinha, CGC ---
05/16.02.2023 Mr. R.P. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that writ
petition has become infructuous.
Learned counsel for the respondents do not object the same.
Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
/punit/
Shri Krishna Sundi
Union of India
Deputy Assistant Director, Army Group Insurance
S. N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
