Disposed
Lakhan Mahato v. Sushil Ram Mahato
Jharkhand HCSA/55/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI SA No. 55 of…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI SA No. 55 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI SA No. 55 of 2019
Lakhan Mahato & Anr. ...… Appellants
Versus
Sushil Ram Mahato
......… Respondent
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Appellant : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani , Adv.
07 / 13.04.2023 Heard the learned counsel for the appellants.
Perusal of the record reveals that the notice issued upon the sole respondent has returned with the report that the sole respondent has died since long but no prayer for substitution has been made.
Accordingly, this appeal abates as a whole.
( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
Lakhan Mahato & Anr.
Sushil Ram Mahato
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court