This Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying contempt case (No.868 of 2017) had been closed by a 2018 order, rendering the challenge to that order non-viable.
Letters Patent Appeal and I.A. No.10302 of 2018 are disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. No.665 of 2018
------
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Sri Sanveej Kumar Mishra, Deputy Commissioner, P.O.-Koderma, P.S. Koderma, District-Koderma
…. …. Appellants
Versus
Ram Naresh Prasad .... .... Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND
------ For the State : Mr. Jai Prakash, AAG-IA
For the Respondent : Mr. Niraj Kishore, Advocate
------
04/Dated: 20.03.2023
It has been informed at Bar that contempt case being Cont. Case (Cvl.) No.868 of 2017 since has been closed vide order dated 22.11.2018, therefore, nothing survives to be decided in this case, since a particular order passed in Cont. Case (Cvl.) No.868 of 2017 on 12.10.2018 was challenged.
Keeping that fact into consideration, the instant Letters Patent Appeal is rendered to be infructuous, accordingly, disposed of.
In consequence thereof, interlocutory application being I.A.
No.10302 of 2018 also stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Subhash Chand, J.)
Rohit/-
The State of Jharkhand and Sri Sanveej Kumar Mishra
Ram Naresh Prasad
Sujit Narayan Prasad
Subhash Chand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
