The Bench dismissed a Criminal Revision Application by default as the petitioner failed to appear before the Court despite earlier notices, while the Appellant was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No.1709 of 2017
Md. Shaheed Alam ... Petitioner -VersusThe State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
------For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, A.P.P. --------- Order No.05 Dated 17th March, 2023
Even today, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
From perusal of the orders dated 13.02.2023 & 27.02.2023 passed by this Court, it appears that none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
When the matter is called out and even today ( i.e., on 17.03.2023), none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, although the learned APP is present.
Under the circumstances, the present Criminal Revision Application No.1709 of 2017 is dismissed for default.
( Sanjay Prasad, J .)
Raja/-
Md. Shaheed Alam
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
