Criminal Revision dismissed as withdrawn by consent of all parties without any substantive ruling.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 1216 of 2022
Rinchu Tudu @ Paya Tudu & Anr. ….. ...... Petitioners Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Anr. …. …. Opp. Parties
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND
------For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Jitesh Kumar, Advocate
-------- Order No.07 /Dated: 21st August, 2023
Mr. Anurag Kashyap, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he wants to withdraw this Criminal Revision.
Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Jitesh Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 have no objection for the same.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Subhash Chand, J.)
Madhav/-
Rinchu Tudu
The State of Jharkhand
Subhash Chand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
