The Bench condensed ten days of delay in filing a bail appeal under the NIA Act. Finding the appellant solely implicated as a SIM vendor, the Court quashed the refusal order and granted bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
The order refusing bail was quashed; appellant released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 142 of 2023 With I.A. No.1113 of 2023
---------
Radhe Kumar, aged about 29 years, son of Sahdev Mahato, resident of Village Kool, Post & P.S. Nalanda, District-Nalanda-803111, Bihar.
.…… Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ……. Respondent
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND
---------- For the Appellant : Mr. Girish Mohan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Shweta Singh, APP
-----------
04/Dated: 02nd March, 2023
I.A. No. 1113 of 2023:
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 142 of 2023:
15.The instant criminal appeal stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Subhash Chand, J.)
Saurabh /-
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in preferring the bail appeal should be condoned.
Whether the appellant, accused only of selling a SIM used to threaten an airport blast, is entitled to bail.
Whether the order refusing bail must be quashed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Radhe Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Sujit Narayan Prasad
Subhash Chand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
