The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous because the final form on the FIR challange had been submitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 481 of 2018
------
Dr. Sudhir Kumar .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Urmila Devi .... .... .... Opp. Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Zaid Ahmad, Advocate
------
Order No.05 Dated : 19.12.2023
It is submitted by learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that final form has been submitted in the present case wherein the F.I.R. was under challenge.
Under the circumstance, the criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Anit
Dr. Sudhir Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Urmila Devi
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
