Petitioner sought withdrawal of a petition in a criminal miscellaneous matter before the High Court of Jharkhand, which the court allowed by dismissing it as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending I.A disposed of; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 440 of 2011
Lalit Kedia @ Lalit Kumar Kedia @ Lalit Agarwal
…… Petitioner
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand
…… Opp. Parties
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kr. Sah, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kumar Singh, A.P.P. For the RRDA : Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, Advocate
Ms. Neha Pandey, Advocate
09/Dated: 03/04/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this
petition.
Learned counsels for the state and RRDA have got no objection.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.A, if any,
stands disposed of. Interim order is vacated.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/
Lalit Kedia @ Lalit Kumar Kedia @ Lalit Agarwal
The State of Jharkhand
Ranchi Regional Development Authority
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court