The petitioner did not press the present criminal miscellaneous petition as the case was found to be not true. The court dismissed the petition for lack of pressing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 4006 of 2022
------
Subodh Kumar .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sartaj Quraishi .... .... .... Opp. Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate For the State : Ms. Priya Shrestha, Special P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. P.C. Sinha, Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
------
Order No.08 Dated : 28.08.2023
It is submitted by learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that after investigation, final form has been filed as the case was found to be not true.
In this view of the matter, the petitioner does not intend to pursue the present petition.
Under the circumstance, instant criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Anit
Subodh Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Sartaj Quraishi
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
