It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.570 of 2023 stood dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 11.09.2023 passed by this Court. It is next submitted that the advocate’s clerk could not mark the cause list, hence, the counsel for the petitioner could not appear before this Court on 11.09.2023 resulting in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.570 of 2023 for non-prosecution. It is next submitted that nonprosecution before this Court on 11.09.2023 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.570 of 2023 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.570 of 2023 be restored to its original file.