Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as no counsel appeared for the petitioner despite repeated calls.
Petition dismissed for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (Cr.) No. 291 of 2023
Rajesh Kumar Sahu … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
… Respondents
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondent : Mr. Shashank Kumar, Adv.
06 / 20.12.2023
Heard the learned counsel for the respondents but no one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that
there is no merit in this petition hence the petitioner is not diligently pursuing the case.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
Rajesh Kumar Sahu
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
