Petitioners argued that their petition became infructuous because the case was compounded by the learned Court. The State accepted this submission. The Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 2692 of 2017
-Versus-
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate For the State : Mr. B.N. Ojha, A.P.P. -----
has become infructuous as the case has been compounded before the
learned Court.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Ajay/
Prawin Kumar Jain
Ashutosh Dixit
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
