Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR regarding kidnapping and abduction. Counsel for the petitioner moved to withdraw the petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to appear before the learned court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2594 of 2016
Monika Kumari Ojha @ Monika Devi @ Monika Tiwari…… Petitioner
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand
2.Onkar Nath Ojha
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---------
For the Petitioner : Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P.
06/Dated: 17/08/2023
This petition has been filed for quashing the F.I.R. in connection with Jorapokhar P.S. Case No. 44 of 2010, corresponding to G.R. No. 444 of 2010, S.T. No. 233/2012 registered under sections 363, 366 of the I.P.C., pending in the Court of learned Additional District Judge VIIIth, Dhanbad.
same shall be decided in accordance with law.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Monika Kumari Ojha @ Monika Devi @ Monika Tiwari
The State of Jharkhand
Onkar Nath Ojha
Munna Tiwari @ Rohit Tiwari
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court