Petitioner sued for quashing of an impugned order in a Magistrate court. No response from petitioner; counsels for State appeared. Petition dismissed for lack of reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 2576 of 2012
----
Dhruba Kumar Ghosh, S/o Pranab Kanti Ghosh, Resident of Patpur, P.O. and P.S. Baharagora, District- East Singhbhum
.... Petitioner
-- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand and Others .... Opposite Parties ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
--For the Petitioner :- none For the State :- Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, Advocate For the O.P.No.2 :- Mr. Saurav Kumar, Advocate ----
6 /20.04.2023 On repeated call nobody has responded on behalf of the petitioner. However, Mr. Saurav Kumar and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, the learned counsels appear on behalf of the O.P.No.2 as well as the respondent State.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
SI/
Dhruba Kumar Ghosh
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
