appearing for the State submits that during the course of investigation, the dead body of the deceased has been identified by the family members of the deceased and thereafter the petitioner-Ajit Kumar and two others have been made accused in this case. He submits that on 19.02.2014, unnamed accused persons namely Ajit Kumar and Amarjeet Kumar were arrested and sent to jail and after completion of investigation, the chargesheet has been submitted vide chargesheet No. 50 of 2014 dated 15.05.2014 under Sections 376(D), 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code against Ajit Kumar (petitioner) and Amarjeet Kumar. He further submits that on 14.06.2014, Preeti Kumari appeared before the police, where her parents and resident of her locality have identified her and her statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and thereafter it has been found that there was no relation in between unknown dead body (which was identified by the family members of Preeti Kumari) and Preeti Kumari. He further submits that in these backgrounds, a final form has been submitted in favour of Ajit Kumar (the petitioner) and Amarjeet Kumar as a mistake of fact before the learned court, vide final form No. 55 of 2014 dated 19.06.2014 under Sections 376(D), 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He further submits that the Director General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi himself has scrutinized the case and suspended all the three police officers, i.e. the Investigating officer of the case, the then Officer-inCharge of Bundu Police Station and the then Officer-in-Charge of Chutia Police Station and also directed for further investigation of the case by the CID, Jharkhand, Ranchi. He further submits that against the three police officers, departmental proceedings have also been initiated against them.
