Petitioner lost interest in the matter. No representations were made. The High Court dismissed the petition and vacated the interim order. Pending interim applications were disposed of.
Petition dismissed; interim order vacated; pending interim applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 2155 of 2015
Jitu Chandravanshi
…… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
…… Opposite Parties
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---------
For the Petitioner : None For the State : None
08/Dated: 11/10/2023
Neither the petitioner nor the State are present.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Interim order is vacated. Pending I.A, if
any, stands disposed of.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/
1 issue framed by the court
whether to allow the petition when the petitioner has lost interest in the matter
Jitu Chandravanshi
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court