The High Court held the criminal revision petition infructuous as the underlying case at the lower court level was disposed of. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as no substantive relief remained to be granted.
Criminal revision petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 2083 of 2014
…… Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …… Opp. Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---------
For the Petitioner : A.C. to J. Mazumdar, Advocate
For the State :Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl. P.P.
04/Dated: 06/12/2023
This matter relates to Piprawar P.S. Case No. 49 of 1998, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 752 of 1998, pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M., Chatra.
learned counsel for the State.
stands vacated.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/
Jahur Mian @ Jahur Miya
Baleshwar Kumar @ Baleshwar Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court