On April 19, 2023, the High Court of Jharkhand (Ranchi) disposed of Cr.M.P. No. 19 of 2014 filed for quashing an F.I.R. and criminal proceedings. The court noted the State submitted a final form, rendering the petition infructuous, and dismissed it accordingly.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 19 of 2014
----
1.Gupteshwar Prasad Sinha 2.Ranjan Kumar Sinha @ Ranjay Kumar Sinha .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand and Another .... Opposite Parties
---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --For the Petitioners :- Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Ruby Pandey, Advocate ----
4 /19.04.2023 This petition has been filed for quashing of F.I.R including entire criminal proceeding in connection with Hazaribagh Sadar P.S.Case No.270 of 2013, G.R.No.1373 of 2013, pending before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh.
Counter affidavit has been filed by the State stating the final form has been submitted whereby the petitioners have not been sent for trial.
In view of the final form, this petition has become
infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
SI/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing the F.I.R. and criminal proceedings has become infructuous.
What is the appropriate disposal of the petition for quashing given the final form.
Gupteshwar Prasad Sinha
Ranjan Kumar Sinha @ Ranjay Kumar Sinha
The State of Jharkhand
The Other
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
