Sivdatt Mehta v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
This proceeding was a criminal miscellaneous petition Cr.M.P. No. 1780 of 2018 subject to this judgment. The court found that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite repeated calls. The opposing counsel submitted that the petitioners were not diligent and there was no merit in the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
The criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.