A writ petition seeking a direction for fair investigation in a pending case was dismissed because the petitioner failed to disclose specific investigation lapses, and the High Court declined to monitor each stage of the investigation.
No relief granted; petition dismissed due to lack of specific disclosure regarding investigation lapses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 101 of 2023
Suman Kumari ………..Petitioner Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Others ………..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : Mr. Naveen Kr. Jaiswal, Advocate For the State : Ms. Neha Pandey, A.C. to Sr. S.C.-III
06/ 07.08.2023: This petition has been filed for direction upon the respondents to conduct fair investigation in the F.I.R. being Ratu P.S. Case No. 37 of 2020, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
satyarthi/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can direct fair investigation when specific failures have not been disclosed.
Suman Kumari
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
