Petitioners claimed insufficient payment despite prior consideration. The single judge disposed of contempt petitions giving liberty to work out remedies and noted pending applications disposed of.
Liberty to work out remedy in accordance with law; pending interlocutory application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 - Cont. Case (Cvl) No.510 of 2021 with Analogous Cases
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No.510 of 2021
Chanchala Singh, wife of late Vijayendra Kumar Singh, Resident of “Swastic Apartment”, Flat No.503, 6th Floor, Near Karmel Junior School, P.O. & P.S. - Sonari, Jamshedpur, Dist. - East Singhbhum/ Jharkhand
…… Petitioner
Versus
With
Contempt Case (Civil) No.537 of 2021
Rajendra Mishra, Son of Late Suryadeo Mishra, Resident of RM K4/391 Sindri, Rangamati, Dhanbad, Jharkhand
…… Petitioner
Versus
….. Opp. Parties
With Contempt Case (Civil) No.392 of 2022
Asin Parwez, S/o Late Kalim Ahmad Aziz @ Late Waliur Rehman, R/o 93, Matkuria Road, Wasseypur, Dhanbad, Jharkhand …… Petitioner
Versus
- 2 - Cont. Case (Cvl) No.510 of 2021 with Analogous Cases
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioners : Mr. Saurav Arun, Advocate Ms. Rinki Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Awanish Shekhar, A.C to A.A.G-I : Mr. Krishna Prajapati, A.C to S.C-V For the V.B.U : Mrs. I. Sen Choudhary, Advocate For the Kolhan Univ. : Dr. A. K. Singh, Advocate Mr. Shivam Singh, Advocate ---------
18/Dated: 03rd October, 2023
1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that although the claim of the petitioners have been considered and payment has been made, but less amount has been paid. The petitioners deserve more payment.
2. In view of the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present contempt petitions stand disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to work out their remedy in accordance with law.
3. With the aforesaid liberty, the contempt petitions stand disposed of.
4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Chandan/-
Chanchala Singh
Rajendra Mishra
Asin Parwez
State of Jharkhand
Kolhan University
Vinoba Bhave University
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
