This order addresses a contempt petition filed against the State where counsel submitted that the order in W.P.(Cr.) No. 325 of 2020 was complied with. The court dropped the contempt proceeding without a detailed order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 508 of 2023
Rizwana Perween
@ Rizwana Perveen ..... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sri Sanjay Kumar ..... … Opposite Parties
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Sidharth Sudhanshu, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.R. Verma, A.C. to SC-III.
05/ 16.09.2023 Learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, jointly submit that the order passed in W.P.(Cr.) No. 325 of 2020 has been complied with.
Amitesh/-
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceeding is sustainable given the compliance of the impugned order in W.P.(Cr.) No. 325 of 2020.
Rizwana Perween
The State of Jharkhand
Sri Sanjay Kumar
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
